Insect sampling in forest ecosystems.

By Simon R. Leather. 2005

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47947e94ffb077b334f16f17185030ace6acee1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. E. Hyvärinen
2. J. Kouki
3. P. Martikainen
4. E. Yerger
5. Tim Nuttle
6. Todd E. Ristau
7. S. Stoleson

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Kouki
2. P. Martikainen
3. E. Yerger
4. Tim Nuttle
5. Todd E. Ristau
6. S. Stoleson
7. Jörg C Müller
8. P. Duelli

In Insect Science

1. J. Kouki
2. E. Hyvärinen
3. P. Martikainen
4. E. Yerger
5. Tim Nuttle
6. Todd E. Ristau
7. S. Stoleson
8. B. Jonsson

Citations in the corpus

• A comparison of three trapping methods used to survey forest-dwelling Coleoptera (2006, background): “Several sampling methods have been developed for forest-dwelling insects (see, Southwood, 1978; Leather, 2005), such as interception (window) traps, malaise traps, pitfall traps, canopy fogging, sieving and direct searching.”
• Legacy of top-down herbivore pressure ricochets back up multiple trophic levels in forest canopies over 30 years (2011, methodology): “To further investigate whether browsing-induced changes in plant composition ricochet up canopy food chains, in May–June 2009, we sampled caterpillars on branch tips (Leather 2005).”