Minimizing the gender difference in perceived safety: Comparing the effects of urban back alley interventions
By B. Jiang, Cecilia Nga Sze Mak, L. Larsen, Hua Zhong. 2017
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Urban alleys are perceived as unsafe, especially by women. We conducted a photograph-questionnaire survey to examine gender difference in perceived safety of alley scenes. Photograph simulation technology was used to create three categories of intervention scenes: Cleaning, Vegetation, and Urban Function & Vegetation. For the existing (Baseline) and Cleaning scenes, perceived safety remained low for both genders, though men's perceived safety was significantly higher than women's. Vegetation scenes were perceived as moderately safe for both genders, but men's ratings were still significantly higher. For Urban Function & Vegetation scenes, perceived safety was high for both genders, and the gender difference largely disappeared. Geometric vegetation yielded higher perceived safety than naturalistic vegetation for both genders. These findings provide clear evidence to support the efforts of policy makers, environmental designers, and community associations seeking to create safe and vital back alley environments for men and women in high-density cities across the world.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Speech and Hearing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/478f5fc5e2e3f613d557751c62a9d27b8d894a96
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Speech and Hearing
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Methodological Choices in the Effects of Experimental Exposure to Simulated Natural Landscapes on Human Health and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “Corresponding factors that can easily be measured or controlled for include prior exposure to nature, race and ethnicity, age, and landscape preferences (Jiang et al., 2017).”