A double-slit ‘which-way’ experiment on the complementarity–uncertainty debate

By R. Mir, Jeff S. Lundeen, Morgan W. Mitchell, Aephraim M. Steinberg, J. Garretson, Howard M. Wiseman. 2007

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A which-way measurement in Young's double-slit will destroy the interference pattern. Bohr claimed this complementarity between wave- and particle-behaviour is enforced by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle: distinguishing two positions at a distance s apart transfers a random momentum q ∼ ℏ/s to the particle. This claim has been subject to debate: Scully et al (1991 Nature 351 111) asserted that in some situations interference can be destroyed with no momentum transfer, while Storey et al (1994 Nature 367 626) asserted that Bohr's stance is always valid. We address this issue using the experimental technique of weak measurement. We measure a distribution for q that spreads well beyond [−ℏ/s, ℏ/s], but nevertheless has a variance consistent with zero. This weak-valued momentum-transfer distribution Pwv(q) thus reflects both sides of the debate.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4771411cff3b65fbcb1395fb8f5c58bb25f8980a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sahel Ashhab
  2. Franco Nori
  3. Abraham G. Kofman
  4. J. You
  5. I. Georgescu
  6. Shannon Whitlock
  7. M. Morgado
  8. K. Bliokh

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Sahel Ashhab
  2. Franco Nori
  3. Abraham G. Kofman
  4. J. You
  5. I. Georgescu
  6. K. Bliokh
  7. Shannon Whitlock
  8. M. Morgado

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Sahel Ashhab
  2. Franco Nori
  3. Abraham G. Kofman

Citations in the corpus