Growth responses and fitness costs after induction of pathogen resistance depend on environmental conditions

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Induced resistance during the interaction pathogen x plant and the use of resistance inducers (2016, background): “The best known commercial resistance inducer is ASM (Dietrich et al., 2005), which is a structural and functional analogue of salicylic acid.”
Nature and ecological implications of pathogen-induced systemic resistance in conifers: A novel hypothesis (2006, background): “[104,105] shown that the strength of constitutive and induced protein-based responses to pathogens in Arabidopsis is modulated by nitrogen availability, while induced secondary metabolite production in stems of conifers was found to be weakened by drought stress [106–109].”
Costs and benefits of hormone-regulated plant defences (2013, background): “However, environmental conditions such as growing period, competition with neighbouring plants, and nitrogen supply, can influence these fitness effects and sometimes avert the growth costs associated with SA-inducible defences (Heidel et al., 2004; Dietrich et al., 2005).”
Practical application of induced resistance to plant diseases: an appraisal of effectiveness under field conditions (2009, background): “Further, whether costs were incurred as a result of resistance induction in wheat and Arabidopsis was dependent on nitrogen supply (Heil et al. 2000; Dietrich et al. 2005).”