Phenology, growth, and fecundity of eight subarctic tundra species in response to snowmelt manipulations

By S. Wipf. Plant Ecology, 2010

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecological Modeling

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47505dd6ecaaef5b75db45026dc3b9a543fe75aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. S. Wipf
2. P. Cherubini
3. H. Gärtner
4. C. Rixen
5. E. Schuur

In Ecological Modeling

1. Rachel L. Rubin
2. O. Bossdorf
3. S. Wipf
4. C. Rixen
5. M. van Kleunen

Citations in the corpus

• The snow and the willows: earlier spring snowmelt reduces performance in the low‐lying alpine shrub Salix herbacea (2016, background): “Early snowmelt also accelerates phenology, but with no corresponding vegetative growth or reproductive response in eight tundra dwarf shrubs (Wipf 2010).”
• Increased plant productivity in Alaskan tundra as a result of experimental warming of soil and permafrost (2012, background): “Accelerated bud break and early season plant growth, which have been observed across the Arctic over the past few decades, have been attributed to earlier snowmelt and warmer air temperatures (Myneni et al. 1997; Arft et al. 1999; Walker, Billings & De Molenaar 2001; Wipf 2010).”
• Temperature modulates intra-plant growth of Salix polaris from a high Arctic site (Svalbard) (2013, background): “…other factors such as late snowmelt or ice encasements might delay the onset of the growing season or reduce summer growth leading to PMR or MR (Wipf 2010; Cooper et al. 2011; Preece and Phoenix 2013), and thus, an unequivocal physiological explanation for their formation in arctic shrubs…”
• Impacts of multiple extreme winter warming events on sub‐Arctic heathland: phenology, reproduction, growth, and CO2 flux responses (2011, result): “This similarity between these species also lends support to the notion that it is V. vitis-idaea’s much later bud burst (Wipf, 2010) (and hence a lower chance of having falsely induced bud burst during the winter event) that may be the cause of its lower sensitivity compared with E. hermaphroditum.”
• Comprehending crystalline β-carotene accumulation by comparing engineered cell models and the natural carotenoid-rich system of citrus (2011, unknown): “Late-flowering species as well as phenophases later in the season were less responsive to snowmelt than early-flowering species or phenophases early in the season because these are controlled by temperature (Price and Waser, 1998; Dunne et al., 2003; Wipf, 2010).”