Question answering in the context of stories
By A. Graesser, K. Lang, Richard M. Roberts. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Shane T. Mueller
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Gary Klein
- Prithviraj Ammanabrolu
- Mark O. Riedl
- Abigail Emrey
- William J. Clancey
- Rogelio Enrique Cardona-Rivera
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, background): “…and Parikh, 2014; Brezillon and Pomerol, 1997; Core, et al., 2006; Graesser and Franklin, 1990; Goguen et al., 1983; Graesser, Gordon, and Brainerd, 1992; Graesser, Lang, and Roberts, 1991; Sacks and Schegloff, 1974; Suthers, Woolf and Cornell, 1992; Walton, 2004, 1007, 2011; Weiner, 1989).”
- Question Answering in the Context of Stories Generated by Computers (2016, methodology): “Instead, we focus on the evaluation with the context closest to ours: answering questions about stories (Graesser & Murachver, 1985; Graesser et al., 1991).”
- Automated Storytelling via Causal, Commonsense Plot Ordering (2020, background): “The second clause draws upon a theory of the role of character goal hierarchies in story understanding by Graesser, Lang, and Roberts (1991): readers attempt to understand “why” things happen by tracking and predicting character goal hierarchies.”
- Narrative Planning: Balancing Plot and Character (2010, methodology): “The QUEST model (Graesser et al., 1991) accounts for the goodness-of-answer (GOA) judgments for questions asked about passages of prose.”