Data-driven computational mechanics

By Trenton Kirchdoerfer, Magdalena Ortiz. 2015

738 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We develop a new computing paradigm, which we refer to as data-driven computing, according to which calculations are carried out directly from experimental material data and pertinent constraints and conservation laws, such as compatibility and equilibrium, thus bypassing the empirical material modeling step of conventional computing altogether. Data-driven solvers seek to assign to each material point the state from a prespecified data set that is closest to satisfying the conservation laws. Equivalently, data-driven solvers aim to find the state satisfying the conservation laws that is closest to the data set. The resulting data-driven problem thus consists of the minimization of a distance function to the data set in phase space subject to constraints introduced by the conservation laws. We motivate the data-driven paradigm and investigate the performance of data-driven solvers by means of two examples of application, namely, the static equilibrium of nonlinear three-dimensional trusses and linear elasticity. In these tests, the data-driven solvers exhibit good convergence properties both with respect to the number of data points and with regard to local data assignment. The variational structure of the data-driven problem also renders it amenable to analysis. We show that, as the data set approximates increasingly closely a classical material law in phase space, the data-driven solutions converge to the classical solution. We also illustrate the robustness of data-driven solvers with respect to spatial discretization. In particular, we show that the data-driven solutions of finite-element discretizations of linear elasticity converge jointly with respect to mesh size and approximation by the data set.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4724e3ab99251b50e4a20e180f840aa18d97c82d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Xiaoying Zhuang
  2. Qizhi He
  3. Jiun-Shyan Chen
  4. Timon Rabczuk
  5. Hongwei Guo
  6. Zeliang Liu
  7. Wing Kam Liu
  8. Cosmin Anitescu

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Hongwei Guo
  2. Nikolaos N. Vlassis
  3. R. Ma
  4. Timon Rabczuk
  5. Xiaoying Zhuang
  6. WaiChing Sun
  7. Khader M. Hamdia
  8. Somdatta Goswami

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Khader M. Hamdia
  2. Somdatta Goswami
  3. C. Brinson
  4. Wei Chen
  5. Qizhi He
  6. Ramin Bostanabad
  7. Wing Kam Liu
  8. Timon Rabczuk

Citations in the corpus