Large variation in salinity tolerance in chickpea is explained by differences in sensitivity at the reproductive stage

By Vincent Vadez, L. Krishnamurthy, R. Serraj, P. Gaur, H. D. Upadhyaya, David A. Hoisington, Rajeev K. Varshney, N. Turner, Kadambot H. M. Siddique. 2007

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4723a43041a9602385231997d7dd902563701a6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Large genetic variation for heat tolerance in the reference collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm (2011, background): “…estimation Differences in crop duration and yield potential (Saxena, 1987) are known to contribute to the seed yield under both drought and salinity stress, and the removal of these effects from seed yield under stress provides a reliable measure of stress tolerance per se (Vadez et al., 2007).”
Abiotic stresses, constraints and improvement strategies in chickpea (2014, background): “…(2006) ICC5003, ICC15610 and ICC1431 Higher yield under salinity Vadez et al. (2007) Hahshem – Sohrabi et al. (2008) JG62 Higher yield under salinity, Early flowering Vadez et al. (2007, 2012b) most recalcitrant when attempted to address through traditional breeding approaches (Tuberosa and Salvi…”
Salt sensitivity of the vegetative and reproductive stages in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Podding is a particularly sensitive stage (2011, methodology): “In summary, our approach nabled us to test the hypothesis that in chickpea the reproductive hase is more salt-sensitive than vegetative growth, and further trengthened the idea of Vadez et al. (2007) that conversion of owers to pods appears to be a salt sensitive process.”
Assessment of ICCV 2 × JG 62 chickpea progenies shows sensitivity of reproduction to salt stress and reveals QTL for seed yield and yield components (2012, methodology): “In previous research, lines ICCV 2 and JG 62, parents of an existing mapping population developed for double poddedness in chickpea (Cho et al. 2002), were reported as sensitive and tolerant (low and high seed yield under salinity), respectively (Vadez et al. 2007).”
Impact of Genomic Technologies on Chickpea Breeding Strategies (2012, background): “Recent screening for salinity tolerance at ICRISAT identified several lines that gave a higher yield than the salinity tolerant cultivar Karnal Chana 1 under saline conditions [29,31].”