Pareto and Piketty: The Macroeconomics of Top Income and Wealth Inequality

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

IS LABOR'S LOSS CAPITAL'S GAIN? GROSS VERSUS NET LABOR SHARES (2017, background): “It is a central object in the controversy over the Piketty (2014) analysis of inequality [Rognlie (2014), Acemoglu and Robinson (2015), Jones (2015), Krusell and Smith (2015)].”
Wealth Inequality and Democracy (2017, background): “This includes differential savings rates across income groups, the return to capital and its variability, and the ability of families to pass on wealth to future generations ( Jones 2015, Benhabib & Bisin 2016).”
Generalized Pareto Curves: Theory and Applications (2017, background): “More recent contributions have shown how such models can account for both the levels and the changes in inequality (Nirei, 2009; Benhabib, Bisin, and Zhu, 2011; Piketty and Zucman, 2015; Jones and Kim, 2017; Jones, 2015; Benhabib and Bisin, 2016; Gabaix, Lasry, et al., 2016).”
Skewed Wealth Distributions: Theory and Empirics (2018, unknown): “65 For a recent study that combines asset riskiness with differences in investor sophistication and endogenous participation in financial markets to explain the US asset ownership dynamics and capital income dispersion see Kacperczyk, Nosal, and Stevens (2015).”
The Dynamics of Inequality (2016, unknown): “This framework will also be the focus of our analysis of transition dynamics in the next section.”