Analysis of the Quiescent Low-Mass X-Ray Binary Population in Galactic Globular Clusters

By C. Heinke, J. Grindlay, P. Lugger, H. Cohn, P. Edmonds, D. Lloyd, A. Cool. 2003

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Quiescent low-mass X-ray binaries (qLMXBs) containing neutron stars have been identified in several globular clusters using Chandra or XMM X-ray observations, via their distinctive soft thermal spectra. We report a complete census of the qLMXB population in these clusters, identifying three additional probable qLMXBs in NGC 6440. We conduct several analyses of the qLMXB population and compare it with the harder, primarily cataclysmic variable (CV), population of low-luminosity X-ray sources with 1031 ergs s-1 < LX < 1032.5 ergs s-1. The radial distribution of our qLMXB sample suggests an average system mass of 1.5 M☉, consistent with a neutron star and low-mass companion. Spectral analysis reveals that no globular cluster qLMXBs, other than the transient in NGC 6440, require an additional hard power-law component, as often observed in field qLMXBs. We identify an empirical lower luminosity limit of ~1032 ergs s-1 among globular cluster qLMXBs. The bolometric luminosity range of qLMXBs implies (in the deep crustal heating model of Brown and collaborators) low time-averaged mass-transfer rates, below the disk stability criterion. The X-ray luminosity functions of the CV populations alone in NGC 6397 and 47 Tuc are shown to differ. The distribution of qLMXBs among globular clusters is consistent with their dynamical formation by either tidal capture or exchange encounters, allowing us to estimate that 7 times more qLMXBs than bright LMXBs reside in globular clusters. The distribution of harder sources (primarily CVs) has a weaker dependence on density than that of the qLMXBs. Finally, we discuss possible effects of core collapse and globular cluster destruction on X-ray source populations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46ea12db8c49907205caf3a4471e011d46a91ebb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Heinke
  2. F. Rasio
  3. Natalia Ivanova
  4. John Fregeau
  5. W. Ho
  6. A. Steiner
  7. Krzysztof Belczynski
  8. S. Bogdanov

Citations in the corpus