The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance

By Narcís Serra, Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2008

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46e6f99571415af0e997d3999e0d275ccd07ff37

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Kean Birch
2. Simon Springer
3. Robert J. Cull
4. Jamie Peck
5. Jun Zhang
6. Lixin Colin Xu
7. J. MacLeavy
8. T. Zhu

Citations in the corpus

• The Handbook of Neoliberalism (2016, background): “As Dani Rodrik (2007) has argued, the early twentieth-first-century orthodoxy on development policy is a kind of ‘augmented Washington Consensus’, one which still contains the core ‘Victorian virtue’ of ‘free markets and sound money’ (Krugman 1995: 29), but now incorporates a range of ‘second genera”
• A variety of capitalism … with Chinese characteristics? (2013, background): “…status of exhibit A in a far-reaching reconsideration of the singular development blueprint associated with the Washington consensus (see Ramo, 2004; Serra and Stiglitz, 2008; Napoleoni, 2011), though arguably more as a negative lesson or corrective, than as a source of unambiguous, ‘positive’…”
• THE NEW DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS: WE SHALL EXPERIMENT, BUT HOW SHALL WE LEARN?* (2008, methodology): “…Hausmann, Lant Pritchett, Charles Sabel, and Andres Velasco) has focused on developing methodologies for designing country-specific growth strategies (Rodrik 2007, Hausmann et al. 2005, 2008) and on innovations in institutional arrangements for industrial policy (Rodrik 2008, Hausmann et al. 2007).”