Reporting Bias and Knowledge Extraction

By Jonathan Gordon, Benjamin Van Durme. 2013

20 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Natural Language Processing

Citations in the corpus

Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings (2016, background): “However, such counts are often misleading [14].”
VQA: Visual Question Answering (2015, background): “nformation about visual scenes; although both captions and questions & answers provide information about the visual world, they do it from different perspectives, with different underlying biases [20], and can function as complementary to one another. 6. Noun tags begin with NN, verb tags begin ”
Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints (2017, background): “Data collection biases have been discussed in the context of creating image corpus (Misra et al., 2016; van Miltenburg, 2016) and text corpus (Gordon and Van Durme, 2013; Van Durme, 2010).”
Seeing through the Human Reporting Bias: Visual Classifiers from Noisy Human-Centric Labels (2015, background): “Instead, it leads to a classifier that attempts to mimic the reporting bias of the annotators.”
Ordinal Common-sense Inference (2016, background): “5 4 For further background see discussions by Van Durme (2010), Gordon and Van Durme (2013), Rudinger et al. (2015) and Misra et al. (2016).”
Deconfounded Image Captioning: A Causal Retrospect (2020, background): “However, since humans are living in a world ﬁlled with various biases, e.g., long-tailed concept distributions [4], [5], reporting bias [6], [7], and language bias [8], [9], we are easily trapped in the loop: “making a dataset”–“it’s biased”–“making a new one”.”
A Survey of Current Datasets for Vision and Language Research (2015, background): “Datasets are affected by both reporting bias (Gordon and Durme, 2013), where the frequency with which people write about actions, events, or states does not directly reﬂect real-world frequencies of those phenomena; they are also affected by photographer’s bias (Torralba and Efros, 2011), where…”