Pair programming in education: a literature review
By Brian F. Hanks, Sue Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander. 2011
198 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, Software Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Paul Denny
- Juho Leinonen
- Sami Sarsa
- Arto Hellas
- Stephen MacNeil
- Seth Bernstein
- Andrew Tran
- Joanne Kim
In Information Systems
- Paul Denny
- Juho Leinonen
- Sami Sarsa
- Arto Hellas
- Stephen MacNeil
- Seth Bernstein
- Andrew Tran
- Joanne Kim
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Sami Sarsa
- Juho Leinonen
- Arto Hellas
- Paul Denny
- Seth Bernstein
- Andrew Tran
- Stephen MacNeil
- Joanne Kim
In Software Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Comparing Code Explanations Created by Students and Large Language Models (2023, background): “This process can be more informal, such as in the case of pair programming when students explain their code and their thought process to a partner as they write their code [16].”
- Experiences from Using Code Explanations Generated by Large Language Models in a Web Software Development E-Book (2022, background): “For example in pair programming, students work together which requires them to often explain their code and their thinking process to their partner [16].”
- Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models (2022, methodology): “Hassan and Zilles propose a novel ‘reverse-tracing’ question format which is non-trivial even when students have access to a computer Hassan and Zilles (2021), and Lehtinen et al. explored automatically creating multiple choice questions from students’ own code Lehtinen et al. (2021). A variety of a”