Skew-monoidal categories and bialgebroids
By Korn'el Szlach'anyi. 2012
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Skew-monoidal categories arise when the associator and the left and right units of a monoidal category are, in a specific way, not invertible. We prove that the closed skew-monoidal structures on the category of right R -modules are precisely the right bialgebroids over the ring R . These skew-monoidal structures induce quotient skew-monoidal structures on the category of R – R -bimodules and this leads to the following generalization: Opmonoidal monads on a monoidal category correspond to skew-monoidal structures with the same unit object which are compatible with the ordinary monoidal structure by means of a natural distributive law. Pursuing a Theorem of Day and Street we also discuss monoidal lax comonads to describe the comodule categories of bialgebroids beyond the flat case.
Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46c78aa8914d5c0de75d926dd380f622fbeea365
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Algebra and Number Theory
In Geometry and Topology
- Ross Street
- Stephen Lack
- Michael Batanin
- Mark Weber
- Aaron D. Lauda
- Bob Coecke
- C. Berger
- Joachim Kock
In Mathematical Physics
- Ross Street
- Stephen Lack
- Michael Batanin
- Mark Weber
- Aaron D. Lauda
- Bob Coecke
- C. Berger
- Joachim Kock
Citations in the corpus
- Skew monoidales, skew warpings and quantum categories (2012, unknown): “fficed. Kelly [16] reduced these to two axioms. However, the reduction depends critically on invertibility of the associativity and unit constraints. A skew-monoidal category in the sense of Szlachányi [28] is defined in the same way as a monoidal category (see [11] or [22]) except that the associativi”
- Skew-closed categories (2012, background): “ivity and unit constraints. The interest back then was quite pedagogical: the invertibility of the associativity constraint of the monoidal structure was at odds with the closed structure. In view of [14] and [9], the topic seems to have a renewed interest. Most of the ideas and calculations here ar”
- Monads need not be endofunctors (2010, background): “[33] K. Szlachányi.”