Point-to-point connectivity, an abstract concept or a key issue for risk assessment studies?

By P. Trinchero, X. Sanchez‐Vila, D. Fernàndez‐Garcia. 2008

70 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Connectivity of high/low-permeability areas has been recognized to significantly impact groundwater flow and solute transport. The task of defining a rigorous quantitative measure of connectivity for continuous variables has failed so far, and thus there exist a suite of connectivity indicators which are dependent on the specific hydrodynamic processes and the interpretation method. Amongst the many existing indicators, we concentrate on those characterizing connectivity between the points involved in a hydraulic or tracer test. The flow connectivity indicator used here is based on the time elapsed for hydraulic response in a pumping test (e.g., the storage coefficient estimated by the Cooper–Jacob method, S est ). Regarding transport, we select the estimated porosity from the breakthrough curve ( ϕ est ) . According to Knudby and Carrera [Knudby C, Carrera J. On the relationship between indicators of geostatistical, flow and transport connectivity. Adv Water Resour 2005;28(4):405–21] these two indicators measure connectivity differently, and are poorly correlated. Here, we use perturbation theory to analytically investigate the intrinsic relationship between S est and ϕ est . We find that ϕ est can be expressed as a weighted line integral along the particle trajectory involving two parameters: the transmissivity point values, T, and the estimated values of S est along the particle path. The weighting function is linear with the distance from the pumping well, thus the influence of the weighting function is maximum at the injection area, whereas the hydraulic information close to the pumping well becomes redundant (null weight). The relative importance of these two factors is explored using numerical simulations in a given synthetic aquifer and tested against intermediate-scale laboratory tracer experiments. We conclude that the degree of connectivity between two points of an aquifer (point-to-point connectivity) is a key issue for risk assessment studies aimed at predicting the travel time of a potential contaminant.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46a6a2da44dc8466b436b4b8c2b2dd2574f930ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Denis Allard
  2. A. Alcolea
  3. Philippe Renard

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Philippe Renard
  2. Denis Allard
  3. A. Alcolea
  4. Muhammad Sahimi
  5. Pejman Tahmasebi
  6. Gregoire Mariethoz
  7. Xavier Emery
  8. Jef Caers

In Geochemistry and Petrology

  1. Philippe Renard

Citations in the corpus