Pushing the Limits of Translation Quality Estimation

By André F. T. Martins, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt, Fabio Kepler, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Chris Hokamp, Roman Grundkiewicz. 2017

76 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Translation quality estimation is a task of growing importance in NLP, due to its potential to reduce post-editing human effort in disruptive ways. However, this potential is currently limited by the relatively low accuracy of existing systems. In this paper, we achieve remarkable improvements by exploiting synergies between the related tasks of word-level quality estimation and automatic post-editing. First, we stack a new, carefully engineered, neural model into a rich feature-based word-level quality estimation system. Then, we use the output of an automatic post-editing system as an extra feature, obtaining striking results on WMT16: a word-level FMULT1 score of 57.47% (an absolute gain of +7.95% over the current state of the art), and a Pearson correlation score of 65.56% for sentence-level HTER prediction (an absolute gain of +13.36%).

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Philipp Koehn
  2. Ondrej Bojar
  3. Lucia Specia
  4. Matt Post
  5. Graham Neubig
  6. Barry Haddow
  7. Qun Liu
  8. Rico Sennrich

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Ondrej Bojar
  2. Lucia Specia
  3. Philipp Koehn
  4. Yvette Graham
  5. Matt Post
  6. Barry Haddow
  7. Marco Turchi
  8. Matteo Negri

Citations in the corpus