Bypassing the Ambient Dimension: Private SGD with Gradient Subspace Identification

By Yingxue Zhou, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Arindam Banerjee. 2020

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Differentially private SGD (DP-SGD) is one of the most popular methods for solving differentially private empirical risk minimization (ERM). Due to its noisy perturbation on each gradient update, the error rate of DP-SGD scales with the ambient dimension $p$, the number of parameters in the model. Such dependence can be problematic for over-parameterized models where $p \gg n$, the number of training samples. Existing lower bounds on private ERM show that such dependence on $p$ is inevitable in the worst case. In this paper, we circumvent the dependence on the ambient dimension by leveraging a low-dimensional structure of gradient space in deep networks---that is, the stochastic gradients for deep nets usually stay in a low dimensional subspace in the training process. We propose Projected DP-SGD that performs noise reduction by projecting the noisy gradients to a low-dimensional subspace, which is given by the top gradient eigenspace on a small public dataset. We provide a general sample complexity analysis on the public dataset for the gradient subspace identification problem and demonstrate that under certain low-dimensional assumptions the public sample complexity only grows logarithmically in $p$. Finally, we provide a theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations to show that our method can substantially improve the accuracy of DP-SGD.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Soham De
  2. Percy Liang
  3. Borja Balle
  4. Tatsunori B. Hashimoto
  5. Jamie Hayes
  6. Samuel L. Smith
  7. Florian Tramèr
  8. Leonard Berrada

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Percy Liang
  2. Tatsunori B. Hashimoto
  3. Gautam Kamath
  4. Borja Balle
  5. Sergey Yekhanin
  6. Yin Tat Lee
  7. Xuechen Li
  8. Samuel L. Smith

Citations in the corpus