URBAN HOUSING MARKETS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: CONVERGENCE, DIVERGENCE OR POLICY 'COLLAPSE'

By N. Pichler-Milanovich. 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/463dbdef4658bd653913f2fe3f7eecc63bd12287

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. A. Murie
2. Anneli Kährik
3. R. Van kempen
4. Gunter Herfert
5. Zoltán Kovács
6. T. Tammaru

In Finance

1. A. Murie
2. Zoltán Kovács
3. Gunter Herfert
4. Anneli Kährik
5. R. Van kempen
6. T. Tammaru

In Urban Studies

1. Zoltán Kovács
2. Gunter Herfert
3. Anneli Kährik
4. R. Van kempen
5. T. Tammaru
6. A. Murie
7. Ya Ping Wang
8. Fulong Wu

Citations in the corpus

• Soviet Prefabricated Panel Housing Estates: Areas of Continued Social Mix or Decline? The Case of Tallinn (2010, background): “In some of the countries, including Estonia, the nationalised housing was returned to the original owners or their heirs (Pichler-Milanovich, 2001; Sýkora, 2008).”
• Development Pathways of Large Housing Estates in Post-socialist Cities: An International Comparison (2012, background): “However, cities of statesocialist countries were also embedded into different political and socio-economic settings, which strongly affected the functioning of the housing market, the development of large housing estates and the attitude of people towards them (Pichler-Milanovich, 2001).”
• THE NEW DIVIDED CITY: CHANGING PATTERNS IN EUROPEAN CITIES (2009, background): “…socialist city and while many areas might have been characterised by a socio-economic mix, it should also be clear that some individuals and families were better off in terms of housing conditions and home location than others (see e.g. Weclawowicz 1979, 2002; Musil 1987; Pichler-Milanovich 2001).”