Variability of Endotoxin Expression in Bt Transgenic Cotton
By H. Dong, W. Li. 2007
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/463c3adb382e857b8abbdfaeefd0f82e568b8c09
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Sustainable pest management for cotton production. A review (2011, background): “However, other species, particularly Helicoverpa armigera, are primary targets in the Old world, despite its lower sensitivity to Cry1Ac toxin, which is of increasing importance as the bioavailability of the toxin in the plant declines later in the season (Dong and Li 2007; Kranthi et al. 2005; Olse”
- Field versus Farm in Warangal: Bt Cotton, Higher Yields, and Larger Questions (2011, background): “Even with one construct, expression varies with the hybrid into which it has been bred, the age of the plant, and various environmental factors (Dong & Li, 2007; Kranthi et al., 2005).”
- Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control (2009, unknown): “But it should be noted that Bt crops may be more target specific than other plant-incorporated insect resistance mechanisms, and Cry expression within plants varies with the developmental stage of the plant (Bird and Akhurst, 2005; Dong and Li, 2007).”