The implications of tourism specialisation in the long run: an econometric analysis for 13 OECD economies

By Alessandro Lanza, Paul Temple, G. Urga. 2003

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/462e2cb072a9f67e8c94a3bb2592034a202b3dca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Climate change and international tourism: a simulation study (2005, methodology): “Lanza et al. (2003) applied this method to 13 OECD countries with the aim of examining the impact of specialisation in tourism.”
Tourism and economic growth in developing countries: P-VAR approach. (2011, result): “By contrary, other studies exchange income, but also creates employment revealed strong bidirectional causality between tourism opportunities, stimulates the growth of the tourism growth and economic growth as documented in [6] for industry and by virtue of this, triggers overall economic China, [7]”
Tourism: Economic growth, employment and Dutch Disease (2015, background): “Lanza, Temple, and Urga (2003) affirm that the lower growth in productivity in tourism-based economy could be overcome by a progressive specialisation on tourism that could improve the terms of trade and compensate the lost in productivity.”
The relationship between tourism, CO2 emissions and economic growth: a case of Mediterranean countries (2019, background): “Some studies affirm the existence of bidirectional relationship between tourism and economic growth for the countries in which they focus; for instance, Dritsakis (2004) for Greece, Kim and Chen (2006) for Taiwan, Khalil, Kakar, and Malik (2007) for Pakistan, Lee and Chien (2008) for Taiwan, Lanza, ”
Tourism productivity and economic growth (2019, background): “The substitute elasticity between tourism and non-tourism goods (θ1) is 0.383, which is supported by Lanza et al. (2003), who argue that the elasticity in developed countries is more likely to be less than one unit.”
Tourism and Economic Development: the Beach Disease? (2011, background): “…on economic growth in the long run across all the countries of the world (e.g. Sequeira & Nunes, 2008) and second in the possible channels by which tourism specialisation can improve or deteriorate economic development (e.g. Lanza et al., 2003), based on the theoretical model of Copeland (1991).”
Inbound tourism and long-run economic growth (2010, background): “This literature has been exploited by a small group of researchers, namely Lanza and Pigliaru (1994) , Liu and Jenkins (1996) , Candela and Cellini (1997) , Lanza, Temple, and Urga (2003) , Algieri (2006) and Brau, Lanza, and Pigliaru (2007) .”
Tourism and GDP (2013, background): “In this regard, some studies consider that country size does not affect the relationship between tourism and economic growth (Lanza, Temple, and Urga 2003; Sequeira and Nunes 2008), but the degree of specialization in tourism is indeed quite relevant (Adamou and Clerides 2010; Holzner 2011; Narayan…”
Tourism, Capital Good Imports and Economic Growth: Theory and Evidence for Spain (2007, background): “More recently, Lanza et al (2003) found an average of around 3 for the expenditure elasticities for 13 European countries (4.02 for France, 4.76 for Austria, etc).”
The Tourism Development–Quality of Life Nexus in a Small Island Destination (2016, background): “According to Lanza, Temple, and Urga (2003), such a situation may be explained by a positive development of the terms of trade in favor of a destination.”