A tutorial on variable selection for clinical prediction models: feature selection methods in data mining could improve the results.
By Farideh Bagherzadeh-Khiabani, A. Ramezankhani, F. Azizi, F. Hadaegh, Ewout W. Steyerberg, D. Khalili. 2016
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Nan Liu
- Di Dong
- Jie Tian
- Ioannis P. Vlahavas
- Marcus Eng Hock Ong
- M. L. N. L. Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
- MS Laura Ruth Venable
- PhD John Fahrenbach
In Health Information Management
In Statistics and Probability
- Nan Liu
- Ioannis P. Vlahavas
- Marcus Eng Hock Ong
- Feng Xie
- M. L. N. L. Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
- MS Laura Ruth Venable
- PhD John Fahrenbach
- Benjamin Alan Goldstein
Citations in the corpus
- AutoScore: A Machine Learning–Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records (2020, background): “Bagherzadeh-Khiabani et al [32] demonstrated that the use of variable selection could improve the performance of clinical prediction models.”
- Machine Learning and Data Mining Methods in Diabetes Research (2017, methodology): “Diagnostic and Predictive Markers The first category deals with biomarker discovery, which is a task mainly performed through feature selection techniques [24-34].”
- The Applications of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Oncology: Opportunities and Challenges (2019, methodology): “The most commonly used feature selection methods in radiomic studies can be divided into three broad categories: filter, wrapper, and embedding [74].”
- Comparison of Variable Selection Methods for Clinical Predictive Modeling (2018, methodology): “This goes against recent literature that claims that fewer variables are better [6].”