ADAPTATION VS. PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN THE SUCCESS OF A CLONAL INVADER

By M. Dybdahl, S. Kane. 2005

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4611425b15cf21f000bf880a62fc92ad4769026b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Michael J. Wingfield
2. B. Slippers
3. M. Ferrari
4. Andrew Sih
5. J. Garnas
6. P. Castro-Díez
7. Á. Alonso
8. R. Hall

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. David J. Harris
2. P. Castro-Díez
3. Á. Alonso
4. R. Hall
5. L. A. Riley
6. R. Lande
7. Andrew Sih
8. M. Ferrari

Citations in the corpus

• What explains the invading success of the aquatic mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Hydrobiidae, Mollusca)? (2008, background): “In other experimental study, Dybdahl & Kane (2005) tested the growth of P. antipodarum to a range of temperatures from 12 to 24C, finding the highest growth rate at 18C.”
• Alien Non-Marine Snails and Slugs of Priority Quarantine Importance in the United States: A Preliminary Risk Assessment (2009, background): “Selfi ng or parthenogenetic rather than outcrossing species may be better invaders (Foltz et al. 1984, Baur and Bengtsson 1987, Dybdahl and Kane 2005).”
• Adaptive versus non‐adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments (2007, background): “S.C. was supported by his own devices.”
• Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change (2011, background): “…contexts: species that have low genetic variation (a common problem after a population bottleneck associated with HIREC) might rely more heavily on plasticity to survive HIREC (Dybdahl and Kane 2005; Strauss et al. 2006), while other species may be able to wait for evolution to run its course.”
• Invasive species impact: asymmetric interactions between invasive and endemic freshwater snails (2008, methodology): “…(negative values), facilitation (positive values), or neither (0 values) is occurring and could be extrapolated to population effects for each species at each site because individual size is positively correlated with reproduction and fitness (i.e., population growth) (see Dybdahl and Kane 2005).”
• Complex patterns of global spread in invasive insects: eco-evolutionary and management consequences (2016, background): “For example, Dybdahl and Kane (2005) found non-zero heritabilities in important life history traits in a parthenogenetic freshwater snail invader, though no evidence of local adaptation was detected (suggesting evolutionary potential but not necessarily that rapid evolution had occurred).”
• Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation (2009, background): “…species invading novel or extreme environments often, but not always, display increased plasticity compared to populations from the native range (Chapman et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2003; Dybdahl & Kane, 2005; Chun et al., 2007; Cano et al., 2008; Lardies & Bozinovic, 2008; Lombaert et al., 2008).”
• The Invasive Species Challenge in Estuarine and Coastal Environments: Marrying Management and Science (2008, background): “On the other hand, species with low genetic diversity could also acclimate to new conditions by being phenotypically plastic (Dybdahl and Kane 2005).”