Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

By M. Molitch, D. Clemmons, S. Malozowski, G. Merriam, S. Shalet, M. Vance, P. A. Stephens. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2006

631 citations recorded by the source corpus.

OBJECTIVE The objective is to provide guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of adults with GH deficiency (GHD). PARTICIPANTS The chair of the Task Force was selected by the Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee of The Endocrine Society (TES). The chair selected five other endocrinologists and a medical writer, who were approved by the Council. One closed meeting of the group was held. There was no corporate funding, and members of the group received no remuneration. EVIDENCE Only fully published, peer-reviewed literature was reviewed. The Grades of Evidence used are outlined in the Appendix. CONSENSUS PROCESS Consensus was achieved through one group meeting and e-mailing of drafts that were written by the group with grammatical/style help from the medical writer. Drafts were reviewed successively by the Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee, the Clinical Affairs Committee, and TES Council, and a version was placed on the TES web site for comments. At each level, the writing group incorporated needed changes. CONCLUSIONS GHD can persist from childhood or be newly acquired. Confirmation through stimulation testing is usually required unless there is a proven genetic/structural lesion persistent from childhood. GH therapy offers benefits in body composition, exercise capacity, skeletal integrity, and quality of life measures and is most likely to benefit those patients who have more severe GHD. The risks of GH treatment are low. GH dosing regimens should be individualized. The final decision to treat adults with GHD requires thoughtful clinical judgment with a careful evaluation of the benefits and risks specific to the individual.

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0237154d33490fc5055acf0a00a84e8d3fb8b771

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. M. H. Murad

Citations in the corpus