Micro- and macroscopic characteristics to stage gonadal maturation of female Baltic cod

By J. Tomkiewicz, L. Tybjerg, Å. Jespersen. 2003

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/460c4b6e0bec92dd6664e92c7e8de8bfa055b928

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. S. Lowerre‐Barbieri
2. J. Tomkiewicz
3. Francisco Saborido-Rey
4. K. Ganias
5. H. Murua
6. N. Brown‐Peterson
7. R. Rideout
8. David M. Wyanski

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Francisco Saborido-Rey
2. S. Lowerre‐Barbieri
3. J. Tomkiewicz
4. David M. Wyanski
5. H. Murua
6. N. Brown‐Peterson
7. R. Rideout
8. J. Hunter

In Physiology

1. J. Tomkiewicz
2. Francisco Saborido-Rey
3. R. Rideout
4. S. Lowerre‐Barbieri
5. N. Brown‐Peterson
6. H. Murua
7. J. Hunter
8. K. Ganias

Citations in the corpus

• A Standardized Terminology for Describing Reproductive Development in Fishes (2011, unknown): “…is often based on either ovarian or oocyte development (West 1990; ICES 2007; N´u˜nez and Duponchelle 2009), and the most advanced oocyte stage is used to determine the overall classifi-cation (e.g., Hilge 1977; Wallace and Selman 1981; Morrison 1990; Hunter et al. 1992; Tomkiewicz et al. 2003).”
• Skipped Spawning in Fishes: More Common than You Might Think (2011, background): “…been considered abnormal (Figure 1) include sterility (Rideout and Burton 2000a), intersex (Schwindt et al. 2009), the presence of follicular cysts (Tomkiewicz et al. 2003b), development of adipose tissue within the testes (Tomkiewicz et al. 2002), parasitic infections that interfere with gamete…”
• Reproductive Timing in Marine Fishes: Variability, Temporal Scales, and Methods (2011, background): “Although maturity classification based on histology has been shown to be more accurate than macroscopic classification (Murua et al. 2003; Tomkiewicz et al. 2003; Vitale et al. 2006), there is no standard level of gonadal development considered representative of “mature,” and often the criteria…”
• Emerging Issues and Methodological Advances in Fisheries Reproductive Biology (2011, background): “In addition, although histological gonadal evaluation has been shown to be more accurate than macroscopic evaluation (Murua et al. 2003; Tomkiewicz et al. 2003; Vitale et al. 2006), there is no clear histological indicator that can be used to separate immature females from mature regenerating female”