Political Institutions, Coercive Diplomacy, and the Duration of Economic Sanctions

By Fiona McGillivray, A. Stam. 2004

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45edc73eabc2e5949c4cec5dac34c6ce8b48adcd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Navin A. Bapat
2. W. H. Kaempfer
3. A. Lowenberg
4. Dursun Peksen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. W. H. Kaempfer
2. A. Lowenberg
3. Navin A. Bapat

In Sociology and Political Science

1. W. H. Kaempfer
2. A. Lowenberg
3. Navin A. Bapat

Citations in the corpus

• The Threat and Imposition of Economic Sanctions, 1971—2000* (2009, background): “Similarly, McGillivray and Stam (2004) suggest that leadership changes, polity type, and the interaction between them are among the most important determinants of the duration of economic sanctions.”
• The Political Economy of Economic Sanctions (2007, background): “Thus McGillivray and Stam (2004) show that leadership change in non-democratic sanctioning and target states is strongly related to the ending of sanctions, whereas leadership change in democratic states is unrelated to the duration of sanctions.”