Development as freedom: the spaces of Amartya Sen

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances (2005, background): “More controversially, some critics have taken issue with the regularity and selectiveness of the examples Sen uses to justify policy insights or have challenged his reading of the empirical evidence (Nolan and Sender, 1992; Corbridge, 2002).”
Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen’s capability approach? (2011, background): “The emphasis on individual agency gives rise to the critique of Sen’s work as being overly individualistic, and paying insufficient attention to groups and social structures (e.g. Corbridge 2002; Devereux 2001; Navarro 2000; Deneulin et al. 2006).”
Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being (2005, unknown): “A guide to literature on the CA can be found on the Capability Association’s website: http://www.capabilityapproach.org Corbridge [2002] considers the CA in relation to the spaces of geography, culture and politics as well as the space of ‘economic or moral evaluation’.”