Aftershocks and Pore Fluid Diffusion Following the 1992 Landers Earthquake

By W. Bosl, A. Nur. 2002

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Implications of deformation following the 2002 Denali, Alaska, earthquake for postseismic relaxation processes and lithospheric rheology (2006, background): “This pressure change drives fluid flow, inducing postseismic deformation and stress changes [Nur and Booker, 1972; Booker, 1974; Rice and Cleary, 1976; Peltzer et al., 1996; Bosl and Nur, 2002; Masterlark and Wang, 2002; Jo´nsson et al., 2003].”
Modeling afterslip and aftershocks following the 1992 Landers earthquake (2007, unknown): “, 1998], pore fluid flow [Peltzer et al., 1998; Bosl and Nur, 2002], and localized shear due to ductile fault zone deformation or frictional sliding, hereafter referred to as afterslip.”
Statistical physics of fracture, friction, and earthquakes (2011, background): “To explain delay times of aftershocks, subcritical cracking due to stress corrosion (Yamashita and Knopoff, 1987) and the variation of effective normal stress due to diffusion of pore fluid, whose pressure is perturbed by the mainshock (Bosl and Nur, 2002), were invoked.”
Introduction to special section: Stress transfer, earthquake triggering, and time‐dependent seismic hazard (2005, unknown): “Diffusive processes of pore pressure relaxation in fractured and saturated rocks have been proposed to explain both earthquakes [Noir et al., 1997; Bosl and Nur, 2002] and induced seismicity [see Shapiro et al.”