Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography.

By O. Olsen, P. Gøtzsche. The Lancet, 2001

741 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

'Young Carers' and Disabled Parents: Time for a change of direction? (2002, background): “This is not unique to social care; similar responses arise when the effectiveness of popular interventions in education (for example, teaching road safety in schools, Achara et al., 2001) and health (for example, screening for breast cancer, Olsen & Gotzsche, 2001) are questioned.”
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. (2004, neutral): “Never 40 (12) 108 (11) 45 (10) 193 (10)”
Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002, background): “A recent review (8) critical of the Swedish studies raised concern about bias in postrandomization exclusions, as evidenced by variation in the reported number of participants.”
Emerging molecular markers of cancer (2002, background): “aspx?version=provider&viewid=53d97cba-89a2-45d4-b55d-b7b5ad7dc2dd">breast cancer , but this approach is highly controversia”