Stabilization of Delay Systems: Delay-Dependent Impulsive Control

By Xiaodi Li, Shiji Song. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2017

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Output tracking control of Boolean control networks with impulsive effects (2018, unknown): “Using the vector form of logical variables and setting x̂(t) = ⋉1 i=1x̂i(t) ∈ Δ2n1 and ŷ(t) = ⋉ p i=1ŷi(t) ∈ Δ2p , similar to (9), one can convert (19), (21), and (22) into { x̂(t + 1) = L3x̂(t), ŷ(t) = Ĥx̂(t), (23)”
Lyapunov Stability for Impulsive Systems via Event-Triggered Impulsive Control (2020, methodology): “Compared with the traditional time-triggered impulsive schemes, such as those in [5]–[8], [14], and [15], Theorem 1 does not impose any direct restriction on time intervals, and the triggering time is completely determined by the designed ETM.”
A Survey of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Formation: Performance, Formation Control, and Communication Capability (2021, background): “There exist plenty of proposals about dealing with delay in network-based control systems [160], [161] since delay can cause control system performance degradation or even instability [162].”