Variational Generative Stochastic Networks with Collaborative Shaping
By Philip Bachman, Doina Precup. 2015
13 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We develop an approach to training generative models based on unrolling a variational autoencoder into a Markov chain, and shaping the chain's trajectories using a technique inspired by recent work in Approximate Bayesian computation. We show that the global minimizer of the resulting objective is achieved when the generative model reproduces the target distribution. To allow finer control over the behavior of the models, we add a regularization term inspired by techniques used for regularizing certain types of policy search in reinforcement learning. We present empirical results on the MNIST and TFD datasets which show that our approach offers state-of-the-art performance, both quantitatively and from a qualitative point of view.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability, Generative Models
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sylvain Gelly
- Mario Lucic
- Marcin Michalski
- Karol Kurach
- Olivier Bousquet
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Yoshua Bengio
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Sylvain Gelly
- Mario Lucic
- Luc Van Gool
- Jitendra Malik
- Karol Kurach
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Xiaogang Wang
In Statistics and Probability
- Marcin Michalski
- Olivier Bousquet
- Sylvain Gelly
- Karol Kurach
- Mario Lucic
- Gábor Lugosi
- Stéphane Boucheron
- Pascal Massart
In Generative Models
- Sylvain Gelly
- Mario Lucic
- Karol Kurach
- Marcin Michalski
- Olivier Bousquet
- Ali Borji
- Jun-Yan Zhu
- Anna Khoreva
Citations in the corpus
- Are GANs Created Equal? A Large-Scale Study (2017, background): “In addition, ranking models based on these estimates is discouraged [4].”
- A note on the evaluation of generative models (2015, neutral): “Counter to this idea, Parzen window estimates of the likelihood have been observed to produce rankings different from other estimates (Bachman & Precup, 2015).”