Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events

By A. Dijksterhuis, Jesse L. Preston, Daniel M. Wegner, Henk Aarts. 2008

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/458bb19ce6df14d519563d6171cb892b6f49e583

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. W. Gervais
2. Megan K. Johnson
3. Daniel M. Wegner
4. Ara Norenzayan
5. Jordan P. LaBouff
6. W. Rowatt

In Social Psychology

1. Megan K. Johnson
2. W. Gervais
3. Jordan P. LaBouff
4. W. Rowatt
5. Daniel M. Wegner
6. Ara Norenzayan
7. Azim Shariff
8. V. Saroglou

Citations in the corpus

• Priming Christian Religious Concepts Increases Racial Prejudice (2010, methodology): “In each LDT trial, participants focused on a fixation point (þ) for 1 s, followed by a premask (XXXXXXX XXX) for 70 ms, a prime word for 35 ms, and a postmask (XXXXXXXXXX) for another 70 ms (see Dijksterhuis et al., 2007).”
• The Illusion of Conscious Will (2018, methodology): “Participants in experiments by Dijksterhuis et al. (2008) were asked to react to letter strings on a computer screen by judging them to be words or not and to do this as quickly as possible in a race with the computer.”
• Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding (2012, background): “…regarding whether individual differences in religiosity moderate the effects of religious and supernatural agent priming, and conclusions of both significant moderation (e.g., Dijksterhuis et al., 2008; McKay et al., 2011; Piazza, Bering, & Ingram, 2011; Shariff & Norenzayan, 2007, Study 2”