Accuracy of Random Groups Equating with Very Small Samples

By G. Skaggs. 2005

72 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45697fc96050e2deb675b75adc4a5b1e9a49abba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Sooyeon Kim
2. Samuel A. Livingston

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Sooyeon Kim
2. Samuel A. Livingston

In Statistics and Probability

1. Sooyeon Kim
2. Samuel A. Livingston

Citations in the corpus

• The Circle-Arc Method for Equating in Small Samples (2009, methodology): “Skaggs (2005) found mean equating to be more accurate than the other methods for below-average scores but not as accurate as the other methods for above-average scores.”