Diets that differ in their FODMAP content alter the colonic luminal microenvironment

By E. Halmos, C. Christophersen, A. Bird, S. Shepherd, P. Gibson, J. Muir. Gut, 2014

628 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Food Science, Gastroenterology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45241f8eeff71008be90d9fd95aee74ce59c1058

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

1. K. Scott

In Molecular Biology

1. Almut Heinken
2. G. Gibson
3. Ines Thiele
4. K. Scott
5. Bernhard O. Palsson
6. M. Roberfroid

Citations in the corpus

• Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components (2017, background): “Total numbers of bacteria declined on the FODMAP diet compared to the habitual Australian diet, with the proportion of a few specific bacterial groups significantly affected [27].”
• Gut Microbiome: Profound Implications for Diet and Disease (2019, background): “While obesity research has traditionally compared low versus high fat diets, a rat study found that a low-fat/ high-sucrose diet led to reduced bacterial diversity, increased Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes, a bloom in Ruminococcaceae, gut inflammation, altered vagal gut-brain communication, and obesity, ”