Time series shapelets: a novel technique that allows accurate, interpretable and fast classification

By Lexiang Ye, Eamonn J. Keogh. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2010

425 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Classification of time series has been attracting great interest over the past decade. While dozens of techniques have been introduced, recent empirical evidence has strongly suggested that the simple nearest neighbor algorithm is very difficult to beat for most time series problems, especially for large-scale datasets. While this may be considered good news, given the simplicity of implementing the nearest neighbor algorithm, there are some negative consequences of this. First, the nearest neighbor algorithm requires storing and searching the entire dataset, resulting in a high time and space complexity that limits its applicability, especially on resource-limited sensors. Second, beyond mere classification accuracy, we often wish to gain some insight into the data and to make the classification result more explainable, which global characteristics of the nearest neighbor cannot provide. In this work we introduce a new time series primitive, time series shapelets, which addresses these limitations. Informally, shapelets are time series subsequences which are in some sense maximally representative of a class. We can use the distance to the shapelet, rather than the distance to the nearest neighbor to classify objects. As we shall show with extensive empirical evaluations in diverse domains, classification algorithms based on the time series shapelet primitives can be interpretable, more accurate, and significantly faster than state-of-the-art classifiers.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Economics and Econometrics, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/450de7320b94e3df15eb9634ae17b1825165c4d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Anthony J. Bagnall
  2. Jason Lines
  3. Martin Wistuba
  4. Nicolas Schilling
  5. Lars Schmidt-Thieme
  6. Aaron Bostrom
  7. Jon Hills
  8. George C. Runger

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Anthony J. Bagnall
  2. Jason Lines
  3. Aaron Bostrom
  4. Jon Hills
  5. Pierre-Alain Muller
  6. Jonathan Weber
  7. Hassan Ismail Fawaz
  8. Germain Forestier

In Signal Processing

  1. Anthony J. Bagnall
  2. Jason Lines
  3. Aaron Bostrom
  4. Jon Hills
  5. James Large
  6. Pierre-Alain Muller
  7. Jonathan Weber
  8. Hassan Ismail Fawaz

Citations in the corpus