On the Consistency of Multiclass Classification Methods
By Ambuj Tewari, Peter L. Bartlett. 2007
367 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
- Shivani Agarwal
- Harish Guruprasad Ramaswamy
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Anton Osokin
- Clayton D. Scott
- Cordelia Schmid
- Zeynep Akata
- W. Ehm
Citations in the corpus
- Quantifying Learning Guarantees for Convex but Inconsistent Surrogates (2018, background): “Consistency of convex surrogates has been the central question of many studies for such problems as binary classification [2, 24, 19], multi-class classification [23, 21, 1, 17], ranking [11, 4, 5, 18, 15] and, more recently, structured prediction [7, 14].”
- On Structured Prediction Theory with Calibrated Convex Surrogate Losses (2017, background): “The consistency of convex surrogates is well understood in the case of binary classification [50, 5, 43] and there is significant progress in the case of multi-class 0-1 loss [49, 46] and general multi∗DI École normale supérieure, CNRS, PSL Research University †National Research University Higher Sc”
- Why ReLU Networks Yield High-Confidence Predictions Far Away From the Training Data and How to Mitigate the Problem (2018, background): “Another approach is the introduction of a rejection option into the classifier [32, 4], in order to avoid decisions the classifier is not certain about.”
- Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networks (2017, methodology): “Additionally, the present work operates in the multiclass setting, and avoids an explicit dependence on the number of classes k , which seems to appear in prior work (Zhang, 2004; Tewari and Bartlett, 2007).”
- Houdini: Fooling Deep Structured Prediction Models (2017, background): “(1) The use of differentiable surrogates is satisfactory for classification because the relationship between such surrogates and the classification accuracy is well established [34].”
- Robust Boosting Algorithm Against Mislabeling in Multiclass Problems (2008, methodology): “For the multi-class problem, the concept of the classification calibrated was proposed [13].”
- A Hybrid Loss for Multiclass and Structured Prediction (2014, background): “But SVMs could be inconsistent when there are more than two classes [18, 11].”
- Does Distributionally Robust Supervised Learning Give Robust Classifiers? (2016, methodology): “We first review Proposition 1 by Bartlett et al. (2006) and Tewari & Bartlett (2007) that justifies the use of classification-calibrated losses in ERM for classification.”
- Knowing what you know: valid confidence sets in multiclass and multilabel prediction (2020, neutral): “[2, 36, 31]), so that s(x, y) > s(x, y′) whenever P (Y = y | X = x) > P (Y = y′ | X = x).”
- Statistical Analysis of Bayes Optimal Subset Ranking (2008, background): “Section II discusses earlier work in statistics and machine learning on global and pair-wise ranking.”
- Consistent Multiclass Algorithms for Complex Performance Measures (2015, background): “…work has focused on lossbased performance measures, including binary/multiclass 0-1 loss (Bartlett et al., 2006; Zhang, 2004a;b; Lee et al., 2004; Tewari & Bartlett, 2007), losses for specific problems such as multilabel classification (Gao & Zhou, 2011) and ranking (Cossock & Zhang, 2008; Xia…”
- Calibrated asymmetric surrogate losses (2012, background): “The case γ = 1 was treated by Bartlett, Jordan and McAuliffe [2], yielding α(1) = 12 .”
- Towards good practice in large-scale learning for image classification (2012, methodology): “There exist several flavors of the multiclass SVM including the Weston and Watkins [39] and the Crammer and Singer [10] formulations (see [31] for a comprehensive review).”
- Multi-Class Deep Boosting (2014, background): “Tewari and Bartlett [2007] (see also [Zhang, 2004a,b]) showed that, in general, loss functions of the form (s1, . . . , sc, y) 7→ Φ(−(sy − maxy′ 6=y sy′)) are not consistent, while those that can be written as (s1, . . . , sc, y) 7→ ∑ y′ 6=y Φ(−(sy − sy′)) are consistent under some additional regula”
- Robust Truncated Hinge Loss Support Vector Machines (2007, background): “Zhang (2004); Tewari and Bartlett (2005) pointed out Fisher inconsistency of H1(min g(f(x), y)).”
- Robust Bi-Tempered Logistic Loss Based on Bregman Divergences (2019, background): “2 Bayes-risk consistency Another important property of a multiclass loss is the Bayes-risk consistency [19].”
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications (2023, background): “Such guarantees are thus both non-asymptotic and hypothesis set-specific and therefore more informative than Bayes consistency guarantees (Zhang, 2004a; Bartlett et al., 2006; Steinwart, 2007; Tewari & Bartlett, 2007).”