Government Procurement and Changes in Firm Transparency

By Delphine Samuels. Accounting Review, 2020

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The government requires its suppliers to have certain internal information processes to reduce uncertainty about their ability to fulfill their commitments. I argue that these requirements improve suppliers' internal information, which leads to better external reporting. Using a dataset of U.S. government contracts, I find a positive relation between government contract awards and firms' external reporting quality. Consistent with procurement-related requirements driving this relation, I find that firms improve their external reporting when they begin contracting with the government, and that the magnitude of the improvement varies predictably with contract characteristics imposing greater requirements on contractors' internal information processes. Finally, I use the establishment of the Cost Accounting Standards Board in 1970 as a shock to contractors' internal information requirements, and find greater improvements in external reporting among firms subject to the CASB. Overall, these results suggest that the government as a customer contributes to shaping firms' information environments.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44f45bbef69b78b4fe88d3b1257a9365de9e5295

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Nemit Shroff
  2. Rodrigo S. Verdi
  3. S. Roychowdhury
  4. Martin Walker
  5. Beatriz García Osma
  6. Juan Manuel García Lara
  7. L. Doukakis
  8. Daniel A. Cohen

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Nemit Shroff

Citations in the corpus