Public Views on Policies Involving Nudges

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The People’s Perspective on Libertarian-Paternalistic Policies (2018, background): “Of particular interest are Hagman et al. (2015), Sunstein (2015b), Tannenbaum et al. (2017), and Jung and Mellers (2016).3 Overall, our results are not inconsistent with theirs though they differ in several key ways:”
Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? (2016, background): “75 See Costa and Kahn (2013), Jung andMellers (2016) in a U.S. context, and Hagman et al. (2015) with a study involving U.S. and Swedish respondents.”
A Review of Nudges: Definitions, Justifications, Effectiveness (2020, unknown): “…nudges are pro-self or pro-social: surveys show that the public’s attitudes are more favorable in the case of pro-social nudges, such as those addressing tax evasion, obesity, and tobacco and alcohol consumption (Hagman et al., 2015; Reynolds et al., 2019; Sunstein, 2015; see also Sunstein, 2017b).”
A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost (2018, unknown): “For the latter, five independent variables were constructed, mirroring the analysis of the European country data.”
American attitudes toward nudges (2016, background): “Following the work of Hagman et al. (2015), we explore attitudes toward nudges among individualists.”