The Nature of Money:

By G. Ingham. European Journal of Sociology, 2016

369 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44e851360a6097be4bae3f5ecd5eeefede806aa5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Anthropology of Money and Finance: Between Ethnography and World History (2014, background): “Monetary theorists in Europe since the nineteenth century have opposed this view of money as a product of individual exchange to one where it is the sole creation of the state (Ingham 2004).”
The Green New Deal in the United States: What it is and how to pay for it (2020, neutral): “This is the standard approach of most economics textbooks, though none, to our knowledge, actually o ﬀ ers a convincing case for it, if a case at all [6,49,50].”
Speculative bubbles in Bitcoin markets? An empirical investigation into the fundamental value of Bitcoin (2015, background): “In addition, Bitcoin can be considered as a legal tender with regard to enforceable debt and tax 2 obligations on citizens (Bell, 2001; Dequech, 2013: Ingham, 2004).”
What is capital? Economists and sociologists have changed its meaning: should it be changed back? (2014, background): “Consequently, his discourse switched to and fro among relational, processual, physical and other incompatible meanings (Ingham 2004, pp. 61-3).”
Neoliberal growth models, monetary union and the Euro crisis. A post-Keynesian perspective (2016, background): “Ingham (2004) stresses the state origin of money, but highlights that the social mode of production of credit money is through private banks.”
Capitalizing on the crowd: The monetary and financial ecologies of crowdfunding (2017, background): “…credit–debt relation that produces claims and obligations which extend into society and well beyond the transaction itself, and that the circulation of monetary claims and obligations are freighted with communicative socio-economic motivations and meanings (Dodd, 2014; Ingham, 2004; Konings, 2015).”
Central banking and the infrastructural power of finance: the case of ECB support for repo and securitization markets (2020, background): “…the crucial insight of a discipline-spanning body of research that maintains that, at the centre of the financial system, state and market actors form a hybrid public–private partnership, or a franchise system (Ingham, 2004; Mehrling, 2010; Pistor, 2013; Hockett and Omarova, 2017; Ricks, 2017).”