Agri-Environmental Stewardship Schemes and “Multifunctionality”

By T. Dobbs, J. Pretty. 2004

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44dad9965dab11e06a61fefc6721deec363cfc51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. J. Pretty
2. Z. Bharucha
3. C. Toulmin
4. S. Williams
5. A. Verspecht
6. C. Cocklin
7. G. Van Huylenbroeck
8. C. Potter

In Soil Science

1. A. Verspecht
2. G. Van Huylenbroeck
3. J. Pretty
4. Z. Bharucha
5. C. Toulmin
6. Alan Franzluebbers
7. Evy Mettepenningen

Citations in the corpus

• The health benefits of walking in greenspaces of high natural and heritage value (2009, background): “…opportunities, water services (accumulation, supply, storm protection and flood control), climate change mitigation (the filtration of air pollution and carbon sequestration) and also more recently, health services (Dobbs and Pretty 2004; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005; Hine et al. 2007).”
• Multifunctionality of Agriculture:A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments (2007, background): “” Although the concept is rather simple, its translation into policies remains however controversial (Dobbs and Pretty, 2004).”
• Reconsidering Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in North America (2007, background): “It appears that in the United Kingdom and Western Europe, a switch from production- or area-based payments to stewardship payments has diversified agricultural practices (Dobbs and Pretty, 2004).”
• Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia (2009, background): “As in other New World or ‘settler’ societies like New Zealand and North America, wilderness in Australia is more highly valued than the farmed countryside (Dibden and Cocklin, 2009; Dobbs and Pretty, 2004; Figgis, 2003).”
• Sustainable intensification in African agriculture (2011, background): “Such effects are called negative externalities because they impose costs that are not reflected in market prices (Baumol and Oates, 1988; Dobbs and Pretty, 2004).”
• Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. (2014, background): “First, these systems tend to be multifunctional within landscapes and economies (Dobbs and Pretty, 2004; MEA, 2005; IAASTD, 2009).”
• Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence (2008, background): “A differentiated approach for agricultural policies will thus become increasingly necessary if agroecosystems are to become more productive while reducing negative impacts on the environment, thus improving efficiency (Dobbs & Pretty 2004; Lee 2005; Wilkins 2007).”