Income Distribution Dynamics with Endogenous Fertility
By Michael Kremer, Daniel L. Chen. 2000
207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44d69fb3df0346979b749d8de31956fdec04c81c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Hosny Zoabi
- Charalambos G. Tsangarides
- Jonathan D. Ostry
- Andrew Berg
- Stephan Klasen
- Moshe Hazan
- Gustavo A. Marrero
- Y. Yakhshilikov
In Gender Studies
- Hosny Zoabi
- Jonathan D. Ostry
- Stephan Klasen
- Moshe Hazan
- Gustavo A. Marrero
- S. Knowles
- S. Seguino
- N. Kabeer
In Sociology and Political Science
- Hosny Zoabi
- Charalambos G. Tsangarides
- Jonathan D. Ostry
- Andrew Berg
- Stephan Klasen
- Moshe Hazan
- Gustavo A. Marrero
- Y. Yakhshilikov
Citations in the corpus
- Cheap Children and the Persistence of Poverty (2001, unknown): “2 Evidence of the negative correlation between fertility and education is also provided by Kremer and Chen (2002), and evidence of the positive correlation between parents’ education and children’s education is also provided by Altonji and Dunn (1996) and by Ahituv (2001), among others.”
- Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? (2008, unknown): “Some of the most influential theoretical contributions include Greenwood and Jovanovic (1990), Galor and Zeira (1993), Alesina and Rodrik (1994), Benabou (1996), Kremer and Chen (2002), Galor and Moav (2004), and Persson and Tabellini (1994).”
- In Search of the Holy Grail: How to Achieve Pro-Poor Growth? (2003, background): “This is despite the research finding that high fertility among the poor can become a poverty trap and that smaller family sizes among the poor have been one of the most powerful ways to reduce inequality in developing countries (Kremer and Chen, 2002; Bourguignon, 2001b; Eastwood and Lipton, 2001).”
- Redistribution, inequality, and growth: new evidence (2018, background): “Second, de la Croix and Doepke (2003), as well as Kremer and Chen (2002), emphasize the potential impact of inequality on differential fertility: because fertility is correlated with income, higher inequality drives higher differences in fertility across income groups. de la Croix and Doepke (2003)…”
- From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory (2004, unknown): “more recently Dahan and Tsiddon (1998), Kremer and Chen (2002), McDermott (2002), De la Croix and”
- How do epidemics induce behavioral changes? (2009, unknown): “We thus get the typical opposition between income and substitution e ects à la Kremer and Chen (2002), which has in general an ambiguous e ect on fertility.11 11It should be noted that Kremer and Chen (2002) directly choose a quasi-linear utility function for the substitution e ect to dominate the…”
- Inequality Of Opportunity And Growth (2013, background): “3 Alternative channels through which inequality can have a negative effect on growth are: unproductive investments (Mason, 1988), demand patterns (Marshall, 1988), fertility (Galor and Zang, 1997; Kremer and Chen, 2002), domestic market size (Murphy et al.”
- Do Highly Educated Women Choose Smaller Families (2015, background): “This has been documented at the aggregate level in a cross-section of countries (Weil, 2005); over time within countries and regions (Galor, 2011) and in cross-sections of households in virtually all developing and developed countries (Kremer and Chen, 2002).”