Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis

By Ahmad Alwosheel, Sander van Cranenburgh, Caspar G. Chorus. Journal of Choice Modeling, 2018

457 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are increasingly used for discrete choice analysis. But, at present, it is unknown what sample size requirements are appropriate when using ANNs in this particular context. This paper fills this knowledge gap: we empirically establish a rule-of-thumb for ANN-based discrete choice analysis based on analyses of synthetic and real data. To investigate the effect of complexity of the data generating process on the minimum required sample size, we conduct extensive Monte Carlo analyses using a series of different model specifications with different levels of model complexity, including RUM and RRM models, with and without random taste parameters. Based on our analyses we advise to use a minimum sample size of fifty times the number of weights in the ANN; it should be noted, that the number of weights is generally much larger than the number of parameters in a discrete choice model. This rule-of-thumb is considerably more conservative than the rule-of-thumb that is most often used in the ANN community, which advises to use at least ten times the number of weights.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Food Science, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/44abea5f9575ac5c84feeb993dd991f9d637d358

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Metabolomics and Multi-Omics Integration: A Survey of Computational Methods and Resources (2020, background): “, number of analytes, number of nodes per layer, and number of layers) [187].”