Carbon Abatement and International Spillovers

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cross-Country Electricity Trade, Renewable Energy and European Transmission Infrastructure Policy (2016, unknown): “23This forward calibration procedure has been used, for example, in Böhringer and Rutherford (2002).”
Climate Politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing? (2002, unknown): “(1999), Bollen et al. (1999), Criqui et al.”
Efficiency and Equity Implications of Alternative Instruments to Reduce Carbon Leakage (2012, unknown): “Böhringer and Rutherford (2002) show that these terms-of-trade effects can dominate the direct abatement cost for unilaterally acting countries and likewise induce substantial losses or gains to countries without abatement action.”
Embodied Carbon Tariffs (2011, unknown): “…of carbon tariffs based on direct embodied emissions, CGE studies commonly find a leakage dampening effect accompanied by terms-of-trade changes that can be substantial relative to the direct cost of emission abatement (Böhringer and Rutherford 2002, Mattoo, Subramanian, Mensbrugghe and He 2009).”
Assessing Emission Allocation in Europe: An Interactive Simulation Approach (2005, background): “There are several articles illustrating the importance of such indirect effects (Böhringer (2002), Böhringer and Rutherford (2002), Bernard et al. (2003), Klepper and Peterson (2002)).”