Regularizing Recurrent Networks - On Injected Noise and Norm-based Methods
By Saahil Ognawala, Justin Bayer. 2014
3 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Advancements in parallel processing have lead to a surge in multilayer perceptrons' (MLP) applications and deep learning in the past decades. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) give additional representational power to feedforward MLPs by providing a way to treat sequential data. However, RNNs are hard to train using conventional error backpropagation methods because of the difficulty in relating inputs over many time-steps. Regularization approaches from MLP sphere, like dropout and noisy weight training, have been insufficiently applied and tested on simple RNNs. Moreover, solutions have been proposed to improve convergence in RNNs but not enough to improve the long term dependency remembering capabilities thereof. In this study, we aim to empirically evaluate the remembering and generalization ability of RNNs on polyphonic musical datasets. The models are trained with injected noise, random dropout, norm-based regularizers and their respective performances compared to well-initialized plain RNNs and advanced regularization methods like fast-dropout. We conclude with evidence that training with noise does not improve performance as conjectured by a few works in RNN optimization before ours.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Optimization & Training, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Quoc V. Le
- David R Ha
- Andrew M. Dai
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Mohit Bansal
- Jianfeng Gao
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
In Optimization & Training
- David R Ha
- Andrew M. Dai
- Quoc V. Le
- Barret Zoph
- Frank Hutter
- Xuanyi Dong
- Mingxing Tan
- Martin Wistuba
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- HyperNetworks (2016, methodology): “Unlike previous approaches (Graves, 2013; Ognawala & Bayer, 2014) of applying weight noise during training, we instead also apply dropout to the recurrent layer (Henaff et al., 2016) with the same dropout probability.”