Routing in Socially Selfish Delay Tolerant Networks
By Qinghua Li, Sencun Zhu, Guohong Cao. 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2010
419 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/447df05b9d44af6dbe3d893a933a91322bf97e50
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey on Trust Modeling (2015, methodology): “That is, a node may forward a packet received from another node that has had past interaction with itself, called social tie [Li et al. 2010] or friendship [Trifunovic et al.”
- Routing in Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networks: A Taxonomy, Survey and Challenges (2013, background): “Apart from a set of incentive and reputation schemes that can be borrowed into DTSNs, Social Selfish Aware Routing (SSAR) [60] addresses this problem from a different aspect, allowing each node to behave according to its unique selfishness, since SSAR considers the selfishness as an underlying servi”
- Opportunistic IoT: Exploring the harmonious interaction between human and the internet of things (2013, background): “According to the social theories, socially selfish is a basic attribute of human beings [22, 23], which will affect human behaviors.”
- Trust Management for SOA-Based IoT and Its Application to Service Composition (2016, background): “Users are connected in a social network represented by a friendship matrix [17].”
- A Survey of Social-Based Routing in Delay Tolerant Networks: Positive and Negative Social Effects (2013, methodology): “[40] have been proposed to take users’ selfish behaviors”