Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome

By Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Nature, 2002

4,945 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/446d341779962dda0d0e7949fe761941f8d35db6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

INDELible: A Flexible Simulator of Biological Sequence Evolution (2009, background): “There is also evidence that rates of substitutions, insertions, and deletions are positively correlated, so that genomic regions with high substitution rates also show high insertion and deletion rates (Waterston et al. 2002).”
Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. (2009, methodology): “To this end, we used probes for MSR (C bands), L1 (the major class of the long interspersed repetitive sequences; G bands) and B1 (the major class of the short interspersed repetitive sequences related to human Alu sequences; R bands) (c.f. Waterston et al., 2002).”
Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy (2005, background): “We can study in detail the distribution of human and mouse genes across the spectrum of tissue specificity and use this to identify commonalities and differences in their promoters with the available complete genome sequences [16], libraries enriched for full-length cDNAs [17-19] and genome-wide sur”
The Genomes of Oryza sativa: A History of Duplications (2005, methodology): “In the mouse project [82], the solution was to use fosmid end pairs, because these inserts are constrained to an almost ideal size of 40 kb.”
Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. (2008, background): “…remains an important application of sequencing, and despite the success in determining the human (International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium 2001; Venter et al. 2001), mouse (Waterston et al. 2002), and numerous other genomes, this is a tiny sample of the millions of species in the biosphere.”
The relationship between non-protein-coding DNA and eukaryotic complexity. (2007, background): “Genome sequence comparisons have shown that multicellular organisms exhibit significant conservation of nonprotein-coding DNA,((42,90,91)) indicating that a sizeable fraction of these sequences have genetic function.”