Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China
By K. Nam, C. Waugh, S. Paltsev, J. Reilly, V. Karplus. 2013
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/446b27837acefda4f1394a591a326deb593b1179
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Citations in the corpus
- Carbon emissions in China: How far can new efforts bend the curve? (2016, methodology): “Previous assessments using the MIT EPPA model have focused largely on the United States and Europe, although several studies have focused on China (Paltsev et al., 2012; Nam et al., 2013) (Tables 1 and 2).”
- Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities (2016, background): “This rapid urbanization and industrialization have led to increased demands for energy and materials, which result in substantial emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), including CO2 [5,6].”
- An in-depth analysis of the evolution of the policy mix for the sustainable energy transition in China from 1981 to 2020 (2020, background): “SO2 is the major cause of acid rain, a precursor to the formation of particulate matters (PM) and a major by-product when high-sulphur coal is consumed in power plants and industrial facilities [52,53].”
- Synergy between pollution and carbon emissions control: Comparing China and the United States (2014, background): “The close link of emissions, in turn, suggests potential synergy between two different policies—pollution abatement and carbon mitigation policies (Nam et al., 2013).”