Accounting for Autocorrelation in Detecting Mean Shifts in Climate Data Series Using the Penalized Maximal t or F Test
By Xiaolan L. Wang. 2008
394 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/444685c659c0c66b5b4d3c49b1df0574388044d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Global and Planetary Change
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Homogenization of precipitation time series with ACMANT (2015, methodology): “and Moberg 1997), penalized maximum t test (PMT) of RHTest (Wang 2008) and Climatol (www.”
- Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data (2012, neutral): “The exception is absolute homogenization (PMFred abs) [23], which typically makes the benchmark data more inhomogeneous for both monthly and yearly mean values.”
- Penalized Maximal F Test for Detecting Undocumented Mean Shift without Trend Change (2008, methodology): “Recently, two stepwise algorithms have been developed to empirically account for serial correlation in detecting multiple changepoints using PMT or PMFT (Wang 2008).”
- New Techniques for the Detection and Adjustment of Shifts in Daily Precipitation Data Series (2010, methodology): “Note that the distribution function of Fmax is complicated and unknown; hence, the Fmax threshold values are estimated through Monte Carlo simulations (Lund and Reeves 2002; Wang 2003).”
- A New Approach to Homogenize Daily Radiosonde Humidity Data (2011, methodology): “Testing for a mean shift at an unknown (or undocumented) location is different from testing for a mean shift at a known location because the critical value for the former is much larger than for the latter (Wang 2008a,b).”