Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

By D. Stacey, France Légaré, K. Lewis, M. Barry, C. Bennett, K. Eden, M. Holmes-Rovner, H. Llewellyn-Thomas, A. Lyddiatt, R. Thomson and 1 more. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017

1,469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4442dd00807f34f85e2c765401fcb9d9861a3d30

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Laura Shay
2. J. Lafata

Citations in the corpus

• Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes (2015, background): “Among these studies, there were no differences in patient reports of having participated in SDM between those given a decision aid or those receiving usual care.(18) Thus, the positive effects of decision aids on patient outcomes may not be attributable to SDM.”
• Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. (2018, background): “DOI: 10.1177/0272989X14551638 Stacey 2017 Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.”