GPS-derived orbits for the GOCE satellite

By Heike Bock, Adrian Jäggi, U. Meyer, P. Visser, J. IJssel, T. Helleputte, M. Heinze, Urs Hugentobler. 2011

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Bernese GNSS Software Version 5.2 (2015, methodology): “The Bernese GNSS Software is capable to perform a LEO POD using either zero–difference (Jäggi et al. 2007; Bock et al. 2011) or double–difference (Jäggi et al.”
First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches (2011, methodology): “…mode accelerations: EGG_CCD_2C Attitude Quaternions: EGG_IAQ_2C (corresponds to columns 56 to 59 of EGG_NOM_2; cf. Gruber 2009) The gravity gradient product EGG_NOM_2 and precise science orbits SST_PSO_2I have been computed by HPF partners, cf. (Bouman et al. 2011b, Bock et al. 2011).”
Validation of GOCE gravity field models by means of orbit residuals and geoid comparisons (2011, methodology): “…conducted for GOCE, where the reduced-dynamic Rapid Science Orbit (RSO) position coordinates were used Table 5 RMS-of-fit of reduced-dynamic orbit solutions for prior and GOCE gravity field models as observations which have a precision of the order of 4 cm (Visser et al. 2009; Bock et al. 2011).”
ESA's satellite‐only gravity field model via the direct approach based on all GOCE data (2014, methodology): “The GOCE precise science orbits [ Bock et al ., 2011] were used to geolocate the gradients, which were separately processed for each component in 42 uninterrupted measurement time spans.”