Assessing habitat use and movement
By C. Simpfendorfer, M. Heupel. 2004
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4414fc84801be011e853694f94922b9eb24d0a8c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Complexities of coastal shark movements and their implications for management (2010, background): “The potential importance of physical and biotic factors in habitat selection by sharks has been reviewed by Simpfendorfer & Heupel (2004) and has been addressed by approximately 75% (n = 79) of the studies included in our review (Table S1 in the supplement).”
- Distribution and habitat partitioning of immature bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) in a Southwest Florida estuary (2005, background): “The role of temperature in wide-scale distribution patterns of sharks is well known (Simpfendorfer and Heupel 2004).”
- Residency of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) at Malpelo Island and evidence of migration to other islands in the Eastern Tropical Pacific (2011, background): “Hence, it is highly vulnerable to overexploitation (Camhi 1998; FAO 2000; Newmark and SantosAcevedo 2001; Watts 2001; Baum et al. 2003; Simpfendorfer and Heupel 2004; Chapman et al. 2005; Jennings et al. 2005).”
- The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review (2008, background): “Habitat selection by elasmobranchs is influenced by a multitude of interacting variables such as temperature, salinity, depth, substrate type, benthic vegetation, prey distribution and variability, predator distribution, social organisation, and reproductive activity (Simpfendorfer and Heupel, 2004)”